Friday, 20 April 2012

To Coach or Not to Coach


To us at People Resolutions, it’s no surprise to discover that the use of business coaching is widespread in UK companies, with almost nine in ten respondents to a survey by the University of Bristol reporting that they now use coaching in their organisation.

We've directly observed a marked shift in HR over the last decade, from spending much of their time firefighting conflict, towards resolving it at an earlier stage and taking measures to preventing it occuring in the first place. One-to-one coaching for select individuals can play a huge part in both the prevention and resolution of workplace conflict, as well as helping staff adapt to the changing business climate. According to Lisa Berkovitz, “people are being forced to navigate the work world according to a new set of rules that no one has explained to them. The essential inner and outer skills needed today, aren’t being taught elsewhere.”

In a short series of two-hour sessions, coaching can explore attitudes, behaviours, communication styles, conflict resolution techniques and other gaps the individual may need to address – a personalised approach that no generic training course could ever match.  Lisa Berkowitz provides an interesting analogy: “There’s a reason why elite athletes and top performers in any field have coaches. A great coach can help reveal your blind spots so you can keep getting past your upper limit.”                 

Many of our customers are keenly aware that by not exploring coaching – for example as a way to resolve an issue or prevent it from escalating, or to help someone find their feet in a new role, the organisation leaves itself exposed to risk and costly outcomes, such as high turnover, grievances raised etc.

So while coaching may appear an expensive luxury, in actual fact for the right person (or group/team) at the right time, it can represent a sound financial investment on the part of the organisation in generating improved working relationships that pay dividends.