Showing posts with label dismissal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dismissal. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 May 2013

Does justice always have to mean ‘punishment’?


Home Secretary Yvette Taylor recently expressed horror (1) when hearing that community resolution was applied in 10,160 incidents of "serious violence" - about 12 times the figure for five years ago. She described the figures as ‘very serious’ and that this it is ‘letting people off.’ She added "That's bad for justice, bad for victims and goes against all the evidence."

Community Resolution is a well established victim-led resolution technique, in many cases including a mediation-style ‘restorative’ dialogue.  Yvette Taylor’s comments are understandable but fill me with dismay as they focus on the potentially negative aspects of a mediation-style resolution process which generally has well-evidenced success.

Association of Chief Police Officer's representative Assistant Chief Constable Garry Shewan speaks positively about how community resolution “will be victim-led and above all reflect their views and wishes." Closure for many victims is an important part of justice. Just like mediation, people who may be responsible for bad behavior also get the chance to move on.

ACC Shewan continues "Going through a restorative justice meeting has also been proven to have more impact on an offender than a prison sentence or a court punishment alone, as they see the consequences of their actions and so want to make changes in their future behaviour."

Mediation in the workplace is also uniquely win/win. It challenges conventional views of justice and often generates strong negative reactions. On other hand those who try mediation very soon see its benefits.

There is good learning here for organisations that are thinking of using a workplace mediator or setting up an in-house mediation service.

1.   Do not push people into mediation – it must be their choice
2.   Mount a campaign to promote the many benefits of mediation alongside the risks.
3.   Do not use mediation in cases where it would send out the wrong message and where a more formal, disciplinary approach might be more suitable.
4.   Make sure you are really thorough in measuring the cost of conflict and the subsequent cost benefits of mediation when used appropriately.
5.   Be persistent and resilient as mediation is always put under much more scrutiny than other more legalistic, formal approaches.

So what have you done in your organisation to overcome negative views of mediation?

John Crawley



[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22346971

Thursday, 29 September 2011

Crying over spilt milk? At least there is some left!

A news story came out of the US this week that caught my eye.  I've heard all sorts of conflict stories from all sorts of different companies and as such I thought I'd heard it all.  But it turns out I was wrong.

The story involves the President of a PR firm sending a rather blunt email to his staff (full copy is available here), threatening them with being fired if they didn't sort themselves out.  So what was this behaviour that the President got so angry about?  In-fighting? Bullying?  No - it was about milk.  Skimmed milk to be exact.

At some point, we've all gone to make a tea or coffee in the morning, only to find that someone has used the last of the milk.  However, the President of this company must have been having a particularly bad day as it resulted in him sending out a mass email including the following:

"I am gravely serious when I write this - if I catch someone not replacing the milk.......then I am going to fire you. Im not joking. You will be fired for not replacing the milk, and have fun explaining that one to your next employer. This is not a empty threat so PLEASE don't test me."