Showing posts with label employee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label employee. Show all posts
Wednesday, 13 March 2013
Monday, 19 March 2012
What your staff survey isn't telling you about workplace conflict
On a daily basis we’re talking with organisations about their employee issues, and one particular HR concern crops up time and again: Based on the annual number of formal grievances and complaints alone, the business could believe it has relatively low levels of conflict, while the staff engagement survey results indicate high levels of reported bullying and harassment. The apparent mismatch between the two metrics understandably makes it difficult to gain an accurate picture of conflict, the consequences of which can be very costly.
Letting ‘ground level’ conflict fester - which can easily happen when HR are often the last to hear about such situations and therefore can’t help diffuse it any earlier - can result in hotspots of tensions and resentments between two or more employees that can impact productivity and engagement within whole teams if left unaddressed. And at the other end of the scale, having to resort to more overt and formal measures such as mediation and investigations also require a financial investment that can get out of hand.
The key to minimising the cost of conflict and the disruption it brings lies in:
a) Getting a full and accurate picture of your conflict in all forms at at all levels, and;
b) Educating everyone in the business about how conflict is caused, how to avoid it in the first place, and how to handle it sensitively and effectively if it does occur.
In a previous post we talk about ‘nipping conflict in the bud’ with training that helps individuals recognise their own and others’ social style and encourages healthy, positive working relationships. We firmly believe that getting a genuine handle on conflict requires a cultural commitment to understanding conflict and being accountable for keeping it to a minimum by all members of staff.
We recently ran a Group Conflict webinar related to the themes in this post – click here for the presentation slides.
Letting ‘ground level’ conflict fester - which can easily happen when HR are often the last to hear about such situations and therefore can’t help diffuse it any earlier - can result in hotspots of tensions and resentments between two or more employees that can impact productivity and engagement within whole teams if left unaddressed. And at the other end of the scale, having to resort to more overt and formal measures such as mediation and investigations also require a financial investment that can get out of hand.
The key to minimising the cost of conflict and the disruption it brings lies in:
a) Getting a full and accurate picture of your conflict in all forms at at all levels, and;
b) Educating everyone in the business about how conflict is caused, how to avoid it in the first place, and how to handle it sensitively and effectively if it does occur.
In a previous post we talk about ‘nipping conflict in the bud’ with training that helps individuals recognise their own and others’ social style and encourages healthy, positive working relationships. We firmly believe that getting a genuine handle on conflict requires a cultural commitment to understanding conflict and being accountable for keeping it to a minimum by all members of staff.
We recently ran a Group Conflict webinar related to the themes in this post – click here for the presentation slides.
Wednesday, 7 March 2012
Who’s leading the way towards Collaboration?
Earlier this week we were informed of new research from the Chartered Management Institute (CMI) and Penna that “Over four in ten managers (43 per cent) consider their line managers to be ineffective.”
Whilst this is shocking in itself, it won’t come as a surprise to many HR professionals in the UK. A large proportion of conflict that we deal with at People Resolutions stems from poor communication – most likely between line managers and employees.
The research also found a strong link between line manager effectiveness and business performance: “Only 39 per cent of managers in low performing business thought their line managers were effective, compared to 80 per cent in high performing organisations”.
People Management Training as a whole has been around for years – but is it working? This research would suggest not. However, this brings the fore the importance of leadership to an organisation. Can a workforce ever truly be 100% effective if the leadership isn’t?
As part of our 2012 mission help organisations move from conflict affliction to collaborative performance, we must also address the question of who leads such a move in organisational culture. With workplace conflict currently costing UK businesses over £24 billion per year, the drive to minimise conflict and move towards a more collaborative culture is more important than ever. As will all substantial shifts in organisational culture we believe that this should be lead from the top.
Thursday, 15 December 2011
New Year memo to self - boost employee health and wellbeing
Christmas is coming fast and with it that annual angel/demon where you are already forgiving yourself for indulging two sizes in the wrong direction with the promise that starting Jan 1st you really honestly will do something about your health.
Of course, businesses do this too. They get to the end of the year, worked and at the moment increasingly partied out, and in the back of their minds they take stock and make very real commitments to making 2012 different, to focusing on improving the health and wellbeing of the bottom line.
Question is, is there a link? Between commitments to improving the health of your business and your own personal vows? I don’t mean, would your business survive next year if you had to be winched out of your bedroom by a crane in January (although that might do it). When I mean health, I also mean psychological and physical health. I mean would the wellbeing of your business be measurably improved if the business and you the employee (whatever your role) made it an explicit targeted measurable goal to make the business more healthy by making everyone in it more healthy?
Put it this way. What if your business sent you this email on Jan 1st:
Dear Max, (my dog’s name as it happens, but go with it)
Hope you had a really great Christmas and welcome back. To get things going – and staying – on the right track for 2012, we’ve decided to do things differently.
Firstly, we’ve decided that it is our business to create a working environment and give you a job that makes you healthy. That it is our business to care about your health and wellbeing, physical and mental. Not just in terms of nutritional food in the canteen, or improved crèche facilities, or marketing ourselves as a great place to work: we mean in the proactive removal of anything and EVERYTHING in your job negatively affecting your health and wellbeing.
So to get the ball rolling, we want to hear some very different New Year’s Resolutions.
- What health targets and plans and facilities we could offer that would make a difference to you (and your families)
- What things (people, processes, ways of doing things around here) that are getting in the way of making your job make you happy (that we can happily change)
Tell us – be honest - and we’ll tell you what we’ll do about it. As adults. Working together. In 2012, we’ll do our part – putting money and board air time where our mouth is – to make you smile when you come to work, to know that the work that you are doing here is the best work of your lives. If you want to work with us to achieve this, were with you all the way. The health of our business depends on it.
from HR
This is a little cheesy of course, but you get my point. Certainly much better than welcome back, can we meet to discuss your workload, cos we’ve got a shedload to get through.
For more on this, check out the free Collaborative Wellbeing – A People Resolutions New Year Manual.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)